![]() The chapter outlines some critical strategies that set out to deconstruct both and to strengthen the position of the reader, including a number of parodies and Pierre Bayard’s ‘detective criticism’. It primarily draws upon novels from the 1930s, a decade frequently singled out as the most productive one of Christie’s career, and the last one to be associated with the ‘Golden Age’ of detective fiction, when writers tended to adhere to genre guidelines playfully set down in prescriptive rule-books. This article scrutinises the detective's privileges in detail, first of all by characterising the narrative conventions to which it is tied. Many crime writers have adapted this setup and strengthened the privileged position which the detective enjoys – infinitely enlarged through the perspective of the loyal deputy whose limited intellectual and abductive abilities act as the proverbial magnifying glass and allow the detective to take on larger-than-life dimensions. ![]() All classical detectives are story-tellers, even though they rarely narrate their adventures themselves, delegating the task to their assistants.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |